They must have been paid by some liberal one-percenter to stand outside New York banks and protest the climate, claiming that they “have the solutions.” Not surprisingly, these protesters couldn’t really articulate any solutions. They were just there to take up space and hold up signs.
The Blaze was on scene asking demonstrators from The People’s Climate March what exactly the solutions were. Here, take a look and see if you can figure out what their plan was to solve the global warming problem:
I’m no shill for the banking industry, but what do they have to do with convincing the earth to stop going through climate cycles? So, this doesn’t have to do with just outlawing SUVs and bankrupting the fossil fuel industry in favor of green one-percenters. It also has to do with forcing the rich to “pay their fair share,” like the old adage says, “From each according to his ability; to each according to his need.” That’s good Marxism right there.
As for the other responses, we got about what we’d expect. Most liberal protesters don’t really know anything about what they’re supposedly protesting. I think they’re attracted mostly to the class warfare stuff. It’s not “fair” that there are people who make more money than they do. Their solution (if they could only articulate it) is to make the rich hand out their money to the “less fortunate” so that those less fortunate don’t have to work as hard.
Somehow, this all gets back to global warming climate change climate disruptions weather extremes.
What’s funny is that liberals will support these people and clamor on about how conservatives are a bunch of “anti-science,” myth-believing mouth-breathers. It just goes to show that all you need is to believe in manmade global warming, and the world will love you. If you so much as raise questions about this theory of manmade global warming, it doesn’t matter how credentialed you are, you must hate science.