Media: Preying In Public School Should Be Legal

It isn’t taking long for various “slippery slope” arguments against the pro-homosexual public policy push. And the media is working as a full-time propaganda platform. An eighteen-year-old girl got into a sexual relationship with a minor teen “about three years younger.” No one at Raw Story could bother to nail down the facts, it seems. The story quotes from a website defending the accused statutory rapist, so I guess they are trying to minimize the age difference as much as possible. So the alleged victim was hopefully at least over fourteen and a half years old, and perhaps fifteen.

Nothing in the story questions that the sexual relationship constitutes statutory rape in the Florida legal code. Heterosexual pervert males have had to watch out for “jail bait” for decades in American legal culture. The disgusting phrase “barely legal” shows that they have had to make sure they skirted around the letter of the law. But now, suddenly, the entire legal framework of making parents the guardians of their children until a legal age is being attacked on the grounds that the relationship was homosexual and the parents of the alleged victim have religious convictions.

“Kaitlyn Ashley Hunt was arrested February 16 by the Indian River County Sheriff’s Office on two counts of lewd or lascivious battery on child. Her mother, Kelley Hunt Smith, explained on Facebook that Kaitlyn began a ‘mutual consenting’ relationship with a girl at Sebastian River High School who was about three years younger. The parents of the younger girl were upset by the situation and contacted police, she wrote. ‘They were out to destroy my daughter, they feel like my daughter “made” their daughter gay,’ Kaitlyn mother’s said. ‘They are bigoted, religious zeolites [sic] that see being gay as a sin and wrong, and they blame my daughter.’ The parents of the younger girl also pressured the Indian River County School Board into expelling Kaitlyn, she added. The teen is now attending an alternative school.”

So if you want to protect your son or daughter from an adult’s sexual advances, you must be a religious “zeolite.” Or perhaps a zealot to literate people.

Notice that, if this couple is as zealous (sorry, I mean zeolitic) as this woman claims, then they would certainly have done exactly the same thing if the girl had been seduced by an eighteen-year-old man. News flash to anti-religious bigots out there: you need to get your facts straight. In the majority of American religions, sex outside of marriage is a sin and no parent wants to see their (more or less?) fifteen year old daughter left as unprotected prey to any young adult who can lure her. If the school is not allowed to give the girl aspirin without parental approval, then a man can get parental consent before he does something a bit more drastic. The same goes for a woman.

As far as we can tell, the family is reacting to this woman’s seduction of their daughter exactly the same way they would react to a man seducing her. And they are asking of a law that is supposed to be applied in such cases to be applied to a woman who violates the law just like it would be applied to a man who violates the law. But their religious convictions against homo-sex are being treated as a reason to nullify the law and give this woman a free pass—Lesbian immunity.

We are currently in the middle of a pansexual legal revolution that will make every child fair game. The law will not allow parents to have anything to do with raising their children.

[js-disqus]