Just before Christmas, Florida Circuit Judge Kevin Carroll defied his own court order by dismissing a lawsuit challenging Barack Obama’s eligibility. On Dec. 13, Carroll gave Michael Voeltz and his attorney until Dec. 23 to respond to the motion’s made by Obama’s attorneys. Yet, on Dec. 21, Carroll dismissed the case prior to his own deadline and then quoted the famous Christmas movie, Miracle on 34th Street in his decision:
“This court notes that President Obama lives in the White House. He flies on Air Force One. He has appeared before Congress, delivered State of the Union addresses and meets with congressional leaders on a regular basis. He has appointed countless ambassadors to represent the interests of the United States throughout the world.”
“As this matter has come before the court at this time of the year it seems only appropriate to paraphrase the ruling rendered by the fictional Judge Henry X. Harper from New York in open court in the classic holiday film ‘Miracle on 34th St.’ ‘Since the United States Government declares this man to be president, this court will not dispute it. Case dismissed.’”
Michael Voeltz’s attorney Larry Klayman challenged Judge Carroll’s decision and its legality:
“This act also flies in the face of this court’s own order of Dec. 13, 2012, which was law of the case.”
“This court had a statutory duty under the Florida Election laws, the Florida and U.S. Constitutions, and 3 U.S.C. Section 5, to adjudicate defendant Obama’s eligibility and his alleged fraudulent acts expeditiously, timely, and before the electors met on Dec. 17, 2012, and before the Electoral College votes on Jan. 6, 2013. Thus, this court also violated these law is dismissing the complaint summarily.”
“This court seems to want to sidestep having to reach these serious and important matters before it.”
In a further development, Judge Carroll just issued an order stating that he refuses to hear any further motions or cases by Voeltz and Klayman challenging Obama’s eligibility. In his order, Carroll wrote:
“No petitions for clarification or further rehearing will be entertained by the court.”
“The court … finds no factual or legal cause to recede from its prior ruling that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction.”
Klayman plans on appealing the case to a higher appellate court. He believes that Carroll just didn’t want to get involved with the legalities of the case and broke state law by dismissing the case in the manner in which he has.
There is no telling what kind of pressure or promises that Obama’s people put on Judge Carroll, but it seems obvious that something has been done to force a circuit court judge to openly defy state law. But then again, Obama and Holder are very experienced at breaking the law, so I guess it shouldn’t be a surprise to see Carroll follow the lead of the nation’s top cop and top impostor.