There’s nobody black people love more than black people (and why shouldn’t they?). So it’s totally logical that when Attorney General Eric Holder announces that a civil-rights lawsuit against George Zimmerman is still a possibility, we hear lots of celebratory whoopin’ and hollerin’ from blacks. Zimmerman killed one of their own, after all.
In such a time of great racial division as we are currently living, afro-centric websites are among the most entertaining for news having anything to do with race (even news having nothing to do with race, which stories are invariably crafted to be about race).
But first, the news from The Washington Times:
U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said George Zimmerman of Florida may have been acquitted of murder charges in the shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, but in the eyes of the federal government, he’s still living in a shadow of suspicion.
Definitely not good for the Obama administration to suspect you of anything. You’ll find yourself hogtied as the IRS has its way with you.
Mr. Holder said he’s still not sure if the federal government will pursue civil rights charges against Mr. Zimmerman, Breitbart.com reported….
“I’m not sure exactly how much longer that will take, but we will get to a point where we are able to make a determination” about a civil rights lawsuit, [Holder] said.
Now here’s how black-culture website Bossip handles this news:
It’s been roughly 4 months since child-murderer George Zimmerman was acquitted of gunning down unarmed 17-year-old Trayvon Martin in February of 2012, but U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder says triggerman Zimmerman still isn’t completely off the hook.
Listen to that language. “Child-murderer.” “Gunned down.” They’re so hysterical over it.
Trayvon wasn’t a child, he was a young adult. And he wasn’t “gunned down” like what blacks do to other blacks in the city, but shot by the Hispanic “cracker” he was in the process of murdering and who, at that point, had been minding his own business.
No civil-rights prosecution will happen. Eric Holder knows there was no civil-rights violation; he’s just paying lip service.
But think about the message it sends to blacks when Holder suggests there was a civil-rights violation on Zimmerman’s part. Blacks are told that Zimmerman, in killing someone who was first trying to kill him, violated his would-be killer’s civil rights. If Zimmerman violated Trayvon’s civil rights, then that means it was Trayvon’s civil right to kill Zimmerman, because that’s the only thing Zimmerman stopped Trayvon from doing.
The American government sets very low standards for black people (it’s what black people want), but this is a new low. What kind of people must Democrats believe blacks to be if they claim it is blacks’ civil right to kill without their victims putting up a fight?